Legal Opinion

Truitt v. Truitt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1918No. 14298PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for Pierce county, Easterday, J., entered February 3,1917, in favor of tbe plaintiff, in an action to cancel a deed, tried to tbe court.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This action was brought by the respondent, in his individual capacity and as executor of his father’s estate, to set aside a deed to lot 3, in block 16, South Tacoma addition to Tacoma, upon an allegation as follows:

“That said George Truitt, deceased, was on his death bed at the county hospital, as a pauper, and both physically and mentally incapable of executing the deed, or conveying property, and was induced and coerced by the said defendant, who knew well that he was in such a weak condition physically and mentally that he was incapable of any intelligent action, and plaintiff alleges…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Deering v. HolcombWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baldridge v. ZiglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Snohomish County v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Town of Twisp v. Methow Valley Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API