Legal Opinion

ConocoPhillips Co. v. Utah Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 20, 2017No. 20160221-CAPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:

¶ 1 The appellants seek to set aside the district court’s judgment against them. They contend that, during the jury trial, the court erred (1) by ruling that portions of a deponent’s testimony did not qualify as admissible expert testimony pursuant to Utah Rule of Evidence 702 and (2) by failing to strike portions of a percipient witness’s testimony that amounted to an unsolicited expert opinion. We conclude that the district court properly excluded the relevant portions of the deposition and that any error in failing to strike the trial testimony was invited;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Allen v. FrielUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. BullockUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Tschaggeny v. Milbank Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. McNeilUtah Supreme Court · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. Martinez-CastellanosUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  2. KTM Health Care Inc. v. SG Nursing Home LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  3. State v. BeverlyUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. DrommondUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Wilson v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API