People v. Rhoads
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DABNEY, J.
After the jury found defendant guilty of possession of more than 28.5 grams of methamphetamine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378; Pen. Code, § 1203.073, subd. (b)(2)) and being under the influence of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11550), the trial court found true the allegations that defendant suffered a prior felony conviction within the meaning of Health and Safety Code section 11370.2, subdivision (c) and that defendant committed the violation of Health and Safety Code section 11378 while out on bail, within the meaning of Penal Code section 12022.1.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. ClappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- People v. GoldsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Boyll v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. CastelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. TrujilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. BlackburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. LainoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.