City of Omaha v. Flood
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Blair, JR
1Opinion of the Court
Ragan, C.
Sixth street is one of the public thoroughfares of the city of Omaha, and extends north and south. It is crossed at right angles by Pine street. These streets are each 100 feet in width. On the southeast corner of their intersection lies block 38 of Credit Foncier Addition, and in the northwest corner of this block are lots 3 and 4 thereof, the property of Andrew Flood. These streets intersect on the crest of a hill or bluff. The authorities of the city of Omaha duly caused the two streets to be graded, and in so doing made a cut in each of said streets in front of Flood’s property…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Davis v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Francis v. . SchoellkopfNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Nevins v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Harper v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gledhill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- James Poultry Co. v. City of Nebraska CityNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Schroder v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- Bischof v. Merchants National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- World Realty Co. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.