Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided January 15, 1948No. Civ. 603PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DARR, District Judge.
By action heretofore taken only one defendant remains in the case, the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway.
Formerly the plaintiff was employed by the defendant as a locomotive engineer under the terms of a collective bargaining contract made on behalf of the plaintiff and others by the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers. Under 1he terms of this contract a charge of misconduct was made against the plaintiff, and a hearing was had by the defendant’s officials resulting in his discharge.
The plaintiff makes the claim that he was wrongfully discharged and in connection…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Order of Railway Conductors of America v. PitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- General Committee v. M.-K.-TR CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Belford Barnett v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashare LinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Michel v. Louisville & N. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Farris v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.