Legal Opinion

In re Washington

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The Commission on Judicial Conduct sustained two charges of misconduct and determined that petitioner, a part-time City Court. Judge, should be removed from office (see NY Const, art VI, § 22; Judiciary Law § 44). Based upon our plenary review of the evidence, we sustain the findings of misconduct and accept the determined sanction of removal.1

Petitioner was appointed a part-time Judge of the White Plains City Court in January 1997. Her duties included presiding over small claims cases on alternate Wednesdays and substituting for the full-time judge when necessary.…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re GreenfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Matter of ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 2001

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re RoseTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Matter of WashingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. In Re RoseUnited States Special Tribunal of Texas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API