Legal Opinion

Tyler v. Dyer

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 15, 1836PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This was an action of debt on a bond, executed by both plaintiff and defendant, in the penal sum of five hundred dollars.

Read the full summary

This was an action of debt on a bond, executed by both plaintiff and defendant, in the penal sum of five hundred dollars. The condition of the bond recited, “ that whereas we have agreed to submit the settlement of the line betwixt the lots No. 16 and 17 in the 4lh range East, in Baldwin, to the determination” of certain referees, “ and have entered into a rule, that their decision shall be final, as to the line and all costs, that have arisen betwixt us about the premises” and provided that the obligation should be void, “ if the said Tyler and Dyer shall abide tlie decision of said referees…

1Opinion of the Court

The action was continued nisi for advisement, and the opinion of the Court afterwards delivered by

Emery J.

This is an action of debt on an aibitration bond, conditioned to abide the decision of three gentlemen, named in the submission, as to the settlement of the line betwixt the lots No. 16 and 17 in the fourth range East, in Baldwin, and all costs that bad arisen betwixt the parties about the premises.

In the progress of tho trial, as opened to the jury, various ob jections were interposed by tho counsel for the defendant and overruled. He objected to the reading of the submission till proof…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Karthaus v. Yllas Y FerrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1828

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. School District No. 5 v. SageWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hoboken Mfrs. R.R. Co. v. Hoboken R.R. C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  3. Bruner v. C. Brewer & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API