Legal Opinion

Maverick v. Burney

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1895No. 323PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Fourth District, in an appeal from Bexar County. Chief Justice James not sitting. The facts are given in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Chief Justice.

—This was an action of trespass to try title, brought by Lenora Mitchell, a feme sole, and by Ella Mauerman and Julia A. Burney, who were married women, and were joined by their husbands, to recover of Sam Maverick and Reagan Houston undivided interests in a tract of land consisting of 475 acres, and for partition. The petition alleged, that the real parties plaintiff owned each an undivided one-fourth interest in the premises in controversy, but did not allege the interest held by the defendants. As the result of the trial, the court adjudged that Ella Mauerman and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fitch v. BoyerTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Camoron v. ThurmondTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Gates v. SalmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. March v. HuyterTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Arnold v. CaubleTexas Supreme Court · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Southwestern Settlement & Development Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Willson v. Superior Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Heller v. HellerTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Ward v. HinkleTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Harris v. MayfieldTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API