Legal Opinion

Dodsworth v. Mayor of Medford

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 3, 1941PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPonan, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to try the title to the office of purchasing agent of the city of Medford. The case was submitted to the judge upon a statement of agreed facts from which it appears that the petitioner was duly appointed purchasing agent on Septem*63ber 7, 1937, for the balance of an unexpired term of three years ending on January 1, 1939, or until his successor was appointed and qualified, in accordance with an ordinance which provides for the appointment to said office by the mayor, subject to confirmation by the board of aldermen, for a term of three years. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bickford v. PageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  2. Stadler v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Matter of Sullivan v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Clark v. State, ex rel. GravesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Keough v. Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. School Committee of Cambridge v. Superintendent of SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Ream v. KuhlmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  3. Newman v. Borough of Fair LawnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Kitty v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  5. Beirne v. GangemiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API