Legal Opinion

Mialkowsky v. Los Angeles Transit Lines

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1958No. Civ. No. 22782PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment on a jury verdict awarding plaintiff damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of plaintiff’s fall while alighting from defendant's streetcar. Plaintiff testified that “ [w]hen I stepped, the first step it was, the street car moved sharply and my feet slipped and I fell down.”

It was defendant’s theory that if plaintiff was injured as a result of a fall, the accident occurred after he had safely alighted from the streetcar. The operator of the car testified that nothing unusual occurred at or about the time, or at the place, as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tossman v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Lund v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Hughes v. HartmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Redwood City Elementary School District v. GregoireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Shivers v. PalmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Farmers Home AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. William Donovan v. Farmers Home AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API