Legal Opinion

Davis v. National Bond & Mortgage Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 17, 1931No. 12546Published

1Opinion

On Appellee’s Motion for Rebearing.

The contention that we erred in failing to dismiss the appeal in this ease because the affidavit of inability to pay costs or give security therefor failed to sufficiently describe the judgment, is overruled. In addition to the reasons upon which we ibased our action as stated in our original opinion, appellant in a reply motion calls our attention to the amendment of article 2266, Rev. Civ. Statutes, passed by the 42d Legislature and effective August 23, 1931 (see Gen. Laws 42d Leg. Gen. Session, c. 134, p. 226 [Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 2266]), which we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Associated Oil Co. v. HartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. PattonTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Maverick v. RouthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  4. Chapman v. WittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Standard Paint Co. v. San Antonio Hardware Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API