Legal Opinion

In re the Detention of Reyes

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 19, 2013No. 28167-1-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKorsmo, C.J.

¶1 Does a litigant have standing to assert the public’s right to attend a motion hearing in a civil case where he did not assert his own right to do so? This appeal from a sexually violent predator determination requires us to face this question and others concerning the meaning and scope of art. I, § 10 of our state constitution. We conclude that the provision creates a right of public access to the courts that can be asserted by a litigant in his own behalf, but may not be asserted by the litigant on behalf of others (the public). We affirm the bench verdict.

BACKGROUND1

¶2 While appellant…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re the Detention of ReyesWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. State v. N.P.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. State v. RochaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. In re Det. of ReyesWashington Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API