Legal Opinion
Skinner v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 28, 2010No. 55A01-0811-CR-543PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
In this interlocutory appeal, Appellant, Defendant Rusty R. Skinner appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to compel disclosure of information obtained in the course of an attorney-client relationship. We affirm.
Issue
Skinner presents one issue on appeal: whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to compel disclosure of information.
Facts and Procedural History
On February 26, 2007, Skinner was charged with Attempted Murder, 1 Robbery, as a Class A felony, 2 Carjacking, a Class B felony, 3 and Operating a Vehicle While Intoxicated, as a Class A…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re Wthr-TvIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Moore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Lahr v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. HoganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Crisis Connection, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. FrommeIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Crisis Connection, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Marvin Beville v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. FrommeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.