State v. Fromme
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Justice.
Ronald Keith Fromme, a defendant in a child molesting prosecution, contends that he has a constitutional right to inspect the records of a nongovernmental counseling *792agency, notwithstanding the General Assembly’s enactment of a “victim advocate privilege” shielding such records from discovery. Because neither the Due Process Clause nor the Sixth Amendment requires disclosure of information protected by this privilege in the present case, we enforce the victim advocate privilege as enacted.
Background
Crisis Connection, Inc., is a nonprofit organization that “provide[s]…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Patrick J. LynchWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- In Re Crisis Connection, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. Patrick J. LynchWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Patrick J. LynchWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016