Legal Opinion

Owens v. Mathews

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 1, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Hickory Circuit Court. — Hon. Argus Cox, ■ Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

LAMM, P. J.-

Plaintiff sued to cancel a mining or prospecting lease because of an alleged wrongful alteration and a failure to perform certain essential conditions and covenants upon the part of the ]essees. Second count in ejectment. Judgment for plaintiff on both, and defendants appeal.

The cause is here on a full printed transcript in which record entries and record proper are commingled with matters of exception in an undistinguish*78able mass. No caption or word tells where the bill of exceptions begins or leaves off. A bill of exceptions was filed bnt what it contains we do not know. We look…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harding v. BedollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Stark v. ZehnderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Pennowfsky v. CoerverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Reno v. JarrellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. State v. BatySupreme Court of Missouri · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Baker v. BirdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  2. Johnston v. RaganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Conway v. HillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  4. Keaton v. WeberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  5. Walser v. LeachMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API