Legal Opinion

Midlands Rental & MacHinery, Inc. v. Christensen Ltd. Partnership

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1997No. S-95-1128PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

Pursuant to separate agreements, Midlands Rental & Machinery, Inc., furnished to L & L Homes, Inc., two forklifts and a storage unit to be used in framing houses on property in a new subdivision. Upon L & L’s failure to make payments on this equipment, Midlands filed a construction lien on the property, of which Christensen Limited Partnership is the title owner. The district court for Dodge County determined that Christensen was not a “protected party” for purposes of the Nebraska Construction Lien Act (Act) and that Midlands had a valid lien in the amount of $13,300. We agree that Midlands…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. KountzeNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Blue Tee Corp. v. CDI Contractors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Landmark Enterprises, Inc. v. M.I. Harrisburg AssociatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. MAY PLUMBING COMPANY v. ShaverNebraska Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Mischke v. MischkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Bauermeister v. McReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Lincoln Lumber Co. v. LancasterNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API