Legal Opinion

Forsyth v. Wallace

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1916No. 13431PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered November 5, 1915, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a passenger in a j itney.

1Opinion of the CourtBausman, J.

Forsyth, a passenger in defendant’s jitney and knocked senseless by a collision, brought suit for damages based on unconsciousness continuing several days, permanent diminution of hearing, and recurring headaches and dizzi*524ness. Defendant appeals from a judgment based upon a verdict for plaintiff.

A first error assigned is the court’s permitting plaintiff in opening to prove industrious habits. We decline to exclude this proof under either the reasoning or the rule in Davis v. Kornman, 141 Ala. 479, 37 South. 789, or of Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Books, 57 Pa. St. 339, 98 Am. Dec. 229. Much sounder…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cameron Mill & Elevator Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  3. Armstrong v. Yakima Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Davis v. KornmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. State v. GaaschWashington Supreme Court · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holland v. Eugene HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API