Legal Opinion

Housing Authority of the County of Santa Clara v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 25, 2016No. 12-209CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BRADEN, Judge.

L RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND. 1

In 1937, Congress authorized public housing agencies (“PHAs”) to administer public tenant-based housing programs under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (“Section 8”). See 42 U.S.C. § 14S7f(b)(l) (“The Secretary [of The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) ] is authorized to enter into annual contributions contracts with [PHAs,] pursuant to which such agencies may enter into contracts to make assistance payments to owners of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Housing Authority of the City of SlidellUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  2. Housing Authority of the City of SlidellUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  3. San Antonio Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API