Legal Opinion

Midkiff v. Hancock East Texas Sanitation, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided July 29, 1999No. 09-97-351 CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from summary judgment. The state of the record before us requires that we examine the finality of the instrument entitled, “Final Summary Judgment,” in light of the holding in Mafrige v. Ross, 866 S.W.2d 590 (Tex.1993), and its progeny. Hurshell Midkiff sued two separate defendants. Hancock East Texas Sanitation, Inc. was MidkifFs employer at the time of the injury. Dolgen-corp of Texas was the purported lessee of the premises upon which Midkiff was injured. During the course of the litigation, both defendants filed separate motions for summary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mafrige v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hervey v. Flores, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
  3. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  4. Vanderwiele v. Llano Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Bomar v. Walls Regional Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Allen v. W.A. Virnau & Sons, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
  2. Stettner Clinic, Inc. v. Burns, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
  3. Jordan v. Jordan, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001
  4. Darden v. Kitz Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1999
  5. Spencer Lucas v. Burleson Publishing Company, Inc., D/B/A Burleson Star, James Moody, Sally Ellertson, Shelley Grant, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API