Legal Opinion

Mundt v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1993No. 39A04-9205-CR-156PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

Mark A. Mundt was convicted by jury of Attempted Burglary as a class B felony. A key part of the State's case was testimony by James R. Baird who was Mundt's accomplice in the attempted burglary. Mundt argues that because Baird's identity was a product of clean-up statements Mundt gave pursuant to his plea agreement, and because Mundt later withdrew his plea, Baird's testimony should be inad missible. We reject Mundt's "derivative evidence" rule and affirm the trial court's admission of Baird's testimony. Mundt also claims that there was insufficient evidence of his prior…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Page v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Page v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Saunders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Collier v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Gunter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hanna v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. FarberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Berry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Gonzalez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Saintignon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API