Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Arcade Inv. Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 23, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
It appears that the Arcade Investment Company is a Minnesota corporation, and that the Yellow Cab Corporation was organized in Delaware. The action is one for personal injuries, and the claim of the plaintiff is that on the 26th day of J anuary, 1928, she went to the office of her doctors in the Lowry building in the city of St. Paul for treatment; that she engaged the defendant Yellow Cab Corporation to conduct her from the doctors’ offices in that building to her residence at South St. Paul; that the cab corporation, pursuant to a long-established custom, accepted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WangelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hay v. May Department Stores Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Cleary v. Ellis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morris v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Watson v. Chevrolet Motor Co. of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Butler Mfg. Co. v. Wallace & Tiernan Sales Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1949
- Sanders v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1929