Legal Opinion
Fulk v. McLellan
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1993No. S-90-1205PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Plaintiff-appellant, Lester Fulk, commenced an action against defendant-appellee, John McLellan, alleging that Fulk was damaged because of McLellan’s negligence and misrepresentations. The district court sustained McLellan’s demurrer to Fulk’s second amended petition and dismissed the actions. Fulk appeals.
In reviewing an order sustaining a demurrer, an appellate court accepts the truth of all facts well pled, as well as the factual and legal inferences which may reasonably be deduced therefrom, but the court does not accept the conclusions of the pleader. Barelmann v. Fox, 239 Neb. 771, 478…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Braesch v. Union InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Commerce Savings Scottsbluff, Inc. v. F.H. Schafer Elevator, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Jack Nottingham v. General American Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Barelmann v. FoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Yousef v. Trustbank Savings, F.S.B.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schieffer v. Catholic Archdiocese of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Gould v. OrrNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Pratt v. Nebraska Board of ParoleNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Gering - Fort Laramie Irrigation District v. BakerNebraska Court of Appeals · 2000
- Zaleski v. Collection Bureau of Grand IslandNebraska Court of Appeals · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.