Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gilkison v. Darlington

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1949No. 17,844Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION

Draper, J.

I agree with the result reached, but I deem it proper to add that in my opinion the appellants’ petition should also be denied for another reason. I think the appellants have failed to make a showing entitling them to relief for reasons other than those mentioned in the majority opinion.

The original exhibits which were introduced in evidence are, or should be, in the custody of the trial court. Unless satisfactory substitutions are made, with the permission of the trial court, by the party desiring to make such substitutions, it will be necessary and proper for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Life Insurance v. LundquistIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Mitchell v. BeissenherzIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hill v. Lincoln National Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Department of Financial Institutions v. NeumannIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Gilkison v. DarlingtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API