Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mauch v. Mauch

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 19, 1966No. 41387Published

1DissentBerry, Justice

I regret my total disagreement with the majority, but am unable to find any substantial basis in the record to support the judgment rendered, or the conclusion that such judgment need not be reversed because there is no showing of substantial prejudice. The importance of the questions involved, when weighed by past expressions dealing with rights of co-tenancy and application of settled rules governing partition of property, is far greater than mere affirmance of a trial court’s judgment upon the ground it is not against the clear weight of the evidence.

Analysis of the matters advanced in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ward v. Ward's HeirsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. York v. TriggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Wolfe v. StanfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Ludey v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Transport Indemnity Company v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API