Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 3, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff in error is before this Court on writ of error from the Criminal Court of Record of Hillsborough County. The record before us is not properly made up, under either Rule 103, or Special Rule 3. Papers purporting to be motions to quash, bill of exceptions, instruction to jury, verdict, judgment, praecipe for writ of error, writ of error, writ ofscire facias ad audiendum errores, assignment of errors and written direction to the clerk for making up transcript, are copied without any recital, or anything else, to show how they came into the case. There is nothing in the record to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  2. Clinton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. Lovett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  4. Killingsworth v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  5. Sigsbee v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. BaynardSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Williamson v. BakerSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Maihoit v. McLeodSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. Fisher v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API