Legal Opinion

Shropshire v. Peery

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1943No. Civil No. 4516PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The appellant, Charles Shropshire, a duly licensed plumbing contractor and a master plumber, was, on or about the 29th day of August, 1940, charged, in a verified complaint by one F. C. Peery filed with the Registrar of Contractors of the State of Arizona, H. C. Sparks, with violating, within the last two years, section 2866(c) of Chapter XV, entitled “Plumbing,” of the Phoenix Municipal Code, reading as follows:

“(c) Any person, firm or corporation carrying on a business of plumbing as a master plumber, who shall allow his name or the name of his firm or corporation to be used by any other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clayton v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Luhrs v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Northeast Rapid Transit Co. v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. AlltCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  2. Mission Hardwood Co. v. Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Mission Hardwood Co. v. Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API