Legal Opinion

In Re Master Knitting Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 4, 1925No. 338PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). This transaction was a conditional sale, which never raises a question of lien, but one of title. In re Fitzhugh, etc., Co., 230 F. 811, 813, 145 C. C. A. 121. That title is defined by the Conditional Sales Act of New York in force when the transaction occurred (chapter 642, p. 1766, Laws N. Y. 1922), which declares that “conditional sale” means “any contract for the sale of goods under which possession is delivered to the buyer and the property in the goods is to vest in the buyer at a *12subsequent time upon the payment” of the purchase price.

This was the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Seward Dredging Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  2. In re Fitzhugh Hall Amusement Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  3. In re I. S. Remson Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Lake's Laundry, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  2. In Re Crown Cartridge Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  3. Hoffman v. Cream-O-ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  4. In Re ChappellDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1948
  5. Quinn v. Bancroft-Jones CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API