Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 28, 1987No. 644A86PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

Defendant was convicted of first-degree rape of a female under the age of thirteen. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in (1) allowing an expert to testify that the defendant was probably the father of the victim’s child, (2) admitting statements made by the victim to medical personnel, (3) allowing an expert to express an opinion as to the victim’s character for truthfulness, and (4) declining to submit the lesser included offense of attempted first-degree rape. We hold that defendant’s arguments (2) and (4) lack merit and although defendant’s arguments (1) and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. AgualloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. United States v. B. H. Webb, A/K/A Hamp WebbCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. State v. HinnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. PurdieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API