Cunningham v. State ex rel. Zartman
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Miami Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.
Prosecution for bastardy, against the appellant, by the State, on the relation of Lucinda Zartman. *378Conviction, followed by the usual order of payments for the support of the child. Appeal.
The only assignment of error in this court is, overruling the motion for a new trial, under which various questions are reserved, among which are exceptions to certain instructions given to the jury by the court, which were as follows:
“ 1. The statement of the prosecuting witness is, that Thomas Cunningham is the father of the child. If it is so, the verdict should be for the plaintiff; if not, for the…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Blough v. ParryIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. CroffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Griffith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Fulwider v. IngelsIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Davis v. ReamerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.