Love v. Commercial Credit Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.
The court did not err in allowing the plaintiff in attachment, named as “Commercial Credit Company,” to amend the attachment affidavit, attachment bond, writ of attachment, declaration in attachment, and the defendant’s replevy bond, by adding the abbreviation “Inc.” after such name, so that the name of the plaintiff in attachment should appear in all the attachment papers as “Commercial Credit Company Inc.,” where it appeared in the amendment that the omission of “Inc” was a clerical error. The amendment purported to correct a misnomer. Where the complete corporate name of a party does not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chattanooga, Rome & Columbus Railroad v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Commissioners v. Aiken Canning Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Allen v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Carrollton Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. PaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robinson v. Reward Ceramic Color Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- McGowans v. Speed Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Ernest G. Beaudry Inc. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Black v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Robinson v. Reward Ceramic Color Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969