Legal Opinion

Miller v. Peter Thomas Roth, LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 22, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00698Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 KARI MILLER, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, No. C 19-00698 WHA 12 v. 13 PETER THOMAS ROTH, LLC, et al., ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 14 Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 16 INTRODUCTION 17 In this false advertising class action about cosmetics, defendants move for summary 18 judgment. Triable issues plague both motions, so, with limited exceptions, they are DENIED. 19 STATEMENT 20 Defendants Peter Thomas Roth, Designs, Global, and Labs LLC (“PTR Labs”) market 21 specialty skincare…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Williams v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Esg Capital Partners v. Venable LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API