Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1924No. 3 Div. 670PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The trial was had on indictment for murder in the first degree, and the death penalty was imposed by the verdict of the jury in due form.

The decision in Ex parte State ex rel. Davis, Atty. Gen. (Brown v. State), 206 Ala. 546, 90 South. 278, was melely an exposition of the effect of the specific provisions of the statute under consideration. Gen. Acts 1915, p. 80, § 29%. See Underhill on Crim. Ev. (2d Ed.) p. 823, § 510. The provisions of section 7089 of the Code of 1907, prescribing the punishment, were set up in count 2 of the indictment on which the trial was had, and are different from the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Moore v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. People v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. McGehee v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. People v. Hong Ah DuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  4. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Alston v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API