Legal Opinion
Gatz v. Ponsoldt
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided July 7, 2003No. 4:02CV3113PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KOPF, District Judge.
This is a derivative class-action RICO 1 suit brought by shareholders of Regency Affiliates, Inc., (“Regency”) against Regency’s former executive officer, director, and controlling stockholder who allegedly implemented a fraudulent scheme to carry out self-dealing transactions; against former Regency directors for breaching their fiduciary duties and duties of loyalty in failing to prevent the fraudulent actions; against Regency’s new chief executive officer; and against the owner of approximately 38.45% of Regency’s common stock — which was…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gatz v. PonsoldtSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Brown Ex Rel. Rhiner v. KerkhoffDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007
- Aviva Life & Annuity Co. v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2014
- Pitts v. Jim Walter Resources, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Angela Smith and Sharon Jackson v. Cigarette Store, LLC; Savage Enterprises, LLC; ACS Laboratory, LLC; Matthew Winters; Christopher Wheeler; Preston Wheeler; and John DoesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.