Legal Opinion

People v. Cornille

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1983No. 56259PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simon

The principal issue in this appeal is whether a defendant in a criminal trial is denied due process of law when an expert witness for the State later turns out to be an imposter who presented false testimony about his expert qualifications. We conclude that false testimony of this type violates due process and that a defendant convicted because of it is entitled to a new trial.

Following his conviction of arson in the circuit court of Williamson County, the defendant, Amil T. Cornille, filed a petition seeking post-conviction relief alleging that he had been convicted on the basis of false…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. AlbaneseIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. EricksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1991

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API