Legal Opinion
State v. Birkenmeier
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 19, 2006PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto
This appeal requires that we determine, under the circumstances presented, the propriety of a vehicle stop and the searches that followed. Defendant Bruce Birkenmeier asserts that, given the quantum of information possessed by the police at the time, the police were required to obtain a search warrant before stopping and searching his car and thereafter securing consent to search his house. The State argues that there was no requirement that the police secure a prophylactic search warrant, that the police had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant’s car and, once stopped, that there was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- State v. CartySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- State v. NishinaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- State v. StovallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANGEL L. RIVERA (16-06-0556, CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CORNELIUS C. COHEN (16-10-0162, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DANIEL T. KATZ (18-06-0790, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DAVID J. LOMANTO (15-04-0776, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. KEITH A. CRUMP (13-12-2233, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.