Legal Opinion
H&D Tire & Automotive-Hardware Inc. v. Pitney Bowes Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 30, 2001No. 99-40430PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
Before POLITZ, GIBSON * and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Pitney Bowes moved for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, following our decision to vacate this case for lack of jurisdic tion. 1 We remain convinced that the federal courts have no jurisdiction over this case.
It began in a Texas state court in February of 1995. Plaintiffs, H&D Tire, Beard, and Jones & Jones, sued on behalf of a class of persons allegedly the victims of certain unauthorized charges Pitney Bowes made when plaintiffs traded up from one piece of leased…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Barbara Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Company, Farrar Oilfield Service and Equipment Co., and Tri-State Oil Services, Inc., Tri-State Oil Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tom Everett v. Verizon Wireless, Inc., Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Shields v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002
- Bridges v. FreeseDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2015
- Bowers v. Jefferson Pilot Financial InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Caraway v. MandelaDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.