Legal Opinion
Naccash v. Hildansid Realty Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 7, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.
The action is brought to foreclose a mortgage and an application is now being made to strike out the defenses in the answer as insufficient in law and the counterclaim therein as not reciting facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The plaintiff was at one time the owner of a plot of ground which has been designated in the papers for convenience as parcels A, B and C, and for similar reason likewise designated herein. In January, 1925, plaintiff secured a release of parcels A and C from a mortgage covering parcels A, B and C and thereafter erected on parcel A two dwelling houses and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lampman v. . MilksNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Paine v. . ChandlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Barson v. . MulliganNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Batterman v. . AlbrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Fritz v. . TompkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Romanchuk v. PlotkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- McInerney v. SturgisNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Naccash v. Hildansid Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931