Harowitz v. Concordia Fire Ins.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County. -t-Hon. P. H. Heiskell, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the Court
Ms.. Justice Buchanan
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The bill prayed for a decree for the full amount of an insurance policy covering the stock of goods in a tailor shop, also for interest and the statutory penalty of twenty-five per cent, of the face of the policy. The decree granted was for the full amount of the policy, $2,000, and interest, $155. Recovery of the penalty was denied. Both parties appealed, and each have assigned errors here.
*693The company’s complaint is that a decree for any amount was erroneous, while Harowitz insists that, in addition to the other amounts, he was also…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hickerson & Co. v. Insurance CompaniesTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Baker v. McFarlandTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Ins. Co. v. Morton-Scott-Robertson Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by10 opinions
- US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. RomayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Life & Casualty Insurance v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
- Palatine Insurance v. E. K. Hardison Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
- Reliance Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Carr v. American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.