Legal Opinion

Washington ex rel. Pieratt v. Bloom

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 21, 1993No. 91-CV-0189-TM; CA A73289PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Husband’s and wife’s marriage was dissolved by an Oregon judgment in 1977. The judgment ordered husband to pay child support. He became delinquent in making the payments and, in 1983, wife instituted a proceeding under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), see ORS 110.005 et seq, in Snohomish County, Washington, where husband then resided. In November, 1983, the Wash-' ington court entered a judgment setting the amount of arrearages and a payment schedule. Husband remained delinquent.

Wife did not renew the Oregon judgment, pursuant to ORS 18.360. However, in 1991, wife…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clarkston v. BridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. STATE EX REL. STATE OF CAL., ETC. v. LagoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. In re the Marriage of QuenzerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. TennisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API