Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided September 18, 2007No. 1055064PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALEY, Judge.

The narrow issue here for resolution is whether the trial court properly concluded that the Commonwealth exercised reasonable diligence to procure the attendance at trial of its deported witness, as a predicate supporting the trial court’s additional determination that that witness was unavailable for trial, thus permitting the admission of the earlier transcribed testimony of that witness, in accord with the principles of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). We affirm.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Thales Morgan, Jr. (“appellant”) was convicted by a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jared Benjamin Bailey v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
  2. Harris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API