Parks v. Hutchins
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Appellate Division that, in the circumstances of this case, defendant City of New York was not entitled to prior written notice pursuant to the so-called "pothole law” (Administrative Code of City of New York § 7-201 [c] [2] [formerly § 394a-1.0 [d] [2]), and that, the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to support the jury’s conclusion that defendant committed negligent acts which constituted a proximate cause of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moss v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Herbert v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- McKenna v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Muhlrad v. Town of GoshenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Burgess v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.