Legal Opinion

Parks v. Hutchins

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1991PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Appellate Division that, in the circumstances of this case, defendant City of New York was not entitled to prior written notice pursuant to the so-called "pothole law” (Administrative Code of City of New York § 7-201 [c] [2] [formerly § 394a-1.0 [d] [2]), and that, the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to support the jury’s conclusion that defendant committed negligent acts which constituted a proximate cause of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moss v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Herbert v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. McKenna v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Muhlrad v. Town of GoshenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Burgess v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API