Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1942No. File No. 8485PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

Plaintiff was injured while in the .employ of defendant railroad company, a carrier engaged in both intrastate and interstate commerce. Proceedings were commenced beforé the industrial commissioner to recover compensation for the injury under the provisions of the Workmen’s .Compensation Law. The railroad company before the industrial commissioner and on appeal to the circuit court contended that plaintiff at the time of his injury was engaged in interstate commerce • and that his right of recovery was governed by the Federal Employers’ Liability Act and not by the Workmen’s Compensation Law…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. YurkonisSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Erie Railroad v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Louisiana Forestry CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. Elmstrand v. G & G Rug & Furniture CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Rohlck v. J & L RAINBOW, INC.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Martinez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Castle v. ThomsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API