Legal Opinion

McKinley v. Wheeler

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 13, 1889No. 233PublishedCited by 13 opinions

ERROR TO' THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE-DISTRICT OF COLORADO. This was an action for the recovery of an undivided interest in a mine. Defendants demurred to the complaint and the demurrer was sustained and the action dismissed. Plaintiff sued out this writ • of error. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Field

This is an action for the possession of an undivided half interest in a mining claim known as the YaHejo lode, in> the mining district of Eoaring Forks, in the county of Pitkin, Colorado.

The plaintiff derives whatever interest he possesses by purchase and conveyance from the Josephine Mining and Prospecting Company, a corporation organized and existing under' the laws of Colorado, for the purpose of prospecting for valuable mineral deposits in the public sdom'am of the United States in that State.-' The Vallejo .lode was discovered and located by that company and two persons named Charles…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank of the United States v. DeveauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  2. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts v. Town of New HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1823

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Trinidad Coal & Coking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Doe v. Waterloo Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1895
  4. Hall's Safe Co. v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  5. In Re Advisory Opinion to GovernorSupreme Court of Florida · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API