Legal Opinion

Garvan v. Kimsey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 31, 1965No. 5-3510PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Johnson, Associate Justice.

The question here involved is the validity of a tax sale of non-producing minerals separate from the land.

The facts are generally not in dispute. Appellee Joe W. Ki'msey and twenty-two other property owners in the Magnet Cove area of Hot Spring County entered into one-year lease agreements with W. A. Keith in April, 1954, for exploration, research and mining minerals on about 900 acres of land. After recording of the leases, the Hot Spring County Tax Assessor assessed the mineral interests for the year 1954 separate from the realty, ostensibly undertaking to act…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. DennisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Pasteur v. NiswangerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  3. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Quality Coal Company v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rice v. First Arkansas Valley Bank (In Re May)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2004
  2. Sierra Club v. DaviesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1990
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2005
  4. Rigsby v. RigsbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Rigsby v. RigsbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API