Legal Opinion

Blazic v. Ohio State Dental Board

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1993No. 92-241PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

The decision of the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County is reversed because the findings in the adjudication order of the OSDB were based on a proper interpretation of Ohio law and were supported by reliable and probative evidence, except for the finding that Dr. Blazic provided dental care that departs from the accepted standards for the profession as required by R.C. 4715.30(A)(7). The sanctions which the OSDB imposed against Dr. Blazic are to remain in effect because they are reasonable, even though there was no evidence to support the charge of substandard dentistry.

I

The OSDB was…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weidner v. BlazicOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Ohio Real Estate Commission v. Aqua Sun Investments, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Zak v. Ohio State Dental Bd., Unpublished Decision (6-10-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API