Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State ex rel. Board of Education v. Beane

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2009No. 34617Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWorkman, J.

(Filed May 5, 2009)

While I concur with the majority opinion’s conclusion that the Putnam County Board of Education (“Putnam County BOE”) should have been made a party to the proceeding, I must dissent from the opinion because of its immense shortcomings in failing to clarify significant legal issues which should be resolved expeditiously.

The insurmountable problem with the majority opinion is the lack of responsiveness to a serious health and safety issue involving a severely disabled child. The thirteen-year-old child involved in this case is wheelchair bound and, according to his treating…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doe v. AlfredDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
  2. Sturm v. Board of Educ. of Kanawha CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re Samantha M.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Ronnie Lee S. v. Mingo County Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API