Legal Opinion

Cannan v. Curkeet

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1936No. 8144PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

Appellees, Wm. R. Curkeet, as owner in fee simple, and Stanolind Oil & Gas Company, a corporation, holding under a mineral lease from Curkeet, brought this suit in the District Court, in trespass to try *574title, against Chas. H. Alexander, J. E. Alexander, Carolyn A. Cannan, and G. C. Cannan, her husband, and J. F. Law, to recover title and possession of two tracts of land in Brazoria county, Tex. At the close of the evidence a verdict was directed in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants, except, Law. Charles H. Alexander and the Cannans have appealed. Error is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Warren v. FrederichsTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. PullenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Burrell v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Houk v. Kirby Petroleum Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  5. West Lumber Co. v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. 2,049.85 Acres of LandDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API