Legal Opinion
Acosta v. Patenaude & Felix
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 10, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00954Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 AMANDA ACOSTA, individually and on Case No.: 19-cv-954-CAB-BGS behalf of all others similarly situated, 9 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiffs, 10 MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL v. OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 11 AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ 12 FEES, COSTS, AND INCENTIVE PATENAUDE & FELIX, AWARD 13 Defendant. [Doc. Nos. 38, 39] 14 15 This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for final approval 16 of class action settlement and motion for attorneys’ fees, costs, and incentive award. [Doc. 17 Nos. 38,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.