Legal Opinion

State v. Howl

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 2016No. S-1-SC-36038; Docket 34,033PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WECHSLER, Judge.

{1} Defendant David Howl was convicted in a jury trial of possession of a controlled substance, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-23 (2011); possession of drug paraphernalia, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-25.1(A) (2001); failure to maintain traffic lane, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 66-7-317 (1978); and no proof of insurance, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 66-5-229(C) (1998).

{2} Defendant argues on appeal that (1) insufficient evidence supported his convictions for possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia, (2) the district…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. New York v. ClassSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. RojoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. CunninghamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. TollardoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BenavidezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State v. FosterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. HowlNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API