Legal Opinion

Heidelberg v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 6, 1959No. 20371PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

1. A deed executed by a husband living separate and apart from his wife, with the intent and purpose of defeating the wife’s right to alimony, is invalid as to the wife, if the grantee knew, or had reasonable grounds to suspect, the intent of the husband in conveying the property. Wood v. Wood, 166 Ga. 519 (143 S. E. 770); Stephens v. Stephens, 168 Ga. 630 (148 S. E. 522); McCallie v. McCallie, 192 Ga. 699, 700 (16 S. E. 2d 562); Von Kamp v. Gary, 204 Ga. 875 (52 S. E. 2d 591); Wood v. McGahee, 211 Ga. 913, 915 (89 S. E. 2d 634). In the present case, it is not alleged that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sowell v. SowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  2. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  3. Stephens v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  4. Kenner v. KennerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  5. McCallie v. McCallieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. WattsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  2. Assurance Co. of America v. Southeastern Brick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  3. Jackson v. WattsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API